Company Overview
Murer- og entreprenør firma J. Kvist ApS is a private Danish masonry and general contracting firm operating on a gross-profit reporting basis. It provides core construction services including bricklaying, structural masonry, and small-scale civil works, primarily within Denmark. With revenue below €10 million, the company represents a compact, locally embedded operator rather than a scaled platform, focused on stable but low-visibility project execution in the Danish market.
Deal Context
The M&A angle is a targeted strategic tuck-in for Baltic contractors seeking immediate Danish market access. Named candidates such as Grigeo and Tallinna Sadam could acquire a ready-made local contracting base, securing masonry capacity and cross-border project credentials without organic build-out. This is a classic bolt-on rather than PE-led growth equity or founder succession play; the acquirer gains regulatory familiarity and client relationships in a high-barrier EU market.
Valuation Context
Baltic listed peers trade at 5.6–9.0x EV/EBITDA (Grigeo 5.6x, Tallinna Sadam 9.0x), providing an upper bound. A private-company discount of 30–40% for size, disclosure gaps, and illiquidity points to a realistic 4–6x EV/EBITDA range. Given undisclosed EBITDA and sub-€10 million revenue, a revenue multiple of 0.4–0.7x appears more practical than EBITDA-based pricing, reflecting thin margins typical in Danish contracting and limited earnings visibility.
Triage Verdict
REVIEW
- Fit: Small scale and Danish contracting focus align with Baltic buyers’ cross-border thesis; sector and geography create a clean strategic hook.
- Red flags: Zero public EBITDA or customer data creates material valuation uncertainty; heavy reliance on Denmark-specific construction cycles adds unquantified macro risk.
- Next step: Request anonymized financials and project backlog from the register or intermediaries to test buyer interest levels before any outreach.
Key Risk
Persistent opacity around actual EBITDA and contract concentration could render any multiple-based valuation unreliable and derail buyer diligence.
Bottom line: A niche strategic entry asset that requires concrete financials before advancing.
| Company | Ticker | Exchange | Expected | Deal Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SpaceX | SPCX | NASDAQ | 2026-06-12 | — |
| Pelican Acquisition II Corp | PLCIU | UNKNOWN | TBD | $86.2M |
| Cartesian Growth Corp IV | CGCFU | UNKNOWN | TBD | $287.5M |
| Research Alliance Corp IV | RACD | UNKNOWN | TBD | $75.0M |
| GLGHK Ltd | GLG | UNKNOWN | TBD | $40.2M |
| Company | Sector | Valuation |
|---|---|---|
| OpenAI | Artificial Intelligence | $1.2T |
| Anthropic | Artificial Intelligence | $965.0B |
| Databricks | Data and Analytics | $201.6B |
# DCF Valuer You build a 5-year discounted cash flow valuation. ## Output structure **Assumptions:** - Revenue growth: Y1-Y5 - EBITDA margin: Y1-Y5 - Capex as % of revenue - Working capital as % of revenue - Tax rate - Terminal growth rate - WACC (+ bridge: cost of equity, cost of debt, capital structure) **Free cash flow forecast:** table Y1-Y5, plus terminal value. **Present value:** sum of discounted FCF + discounted terminal value = enterprise value. **Equity bridge:** EV − net debt + cash − minorities = equity value. Divide by shares for per-share. **Sensitivity grid:** WACC (3 val…