Company Overview
Padel Club Hjørring ApS operates one or more padel facilities in northern Denmark, generating revenue from court rentals, equipment, and ancillary services on a gross-profit reporting basis typical of small Danish CVR filers. With estimated turnover below €10M and likely EBITDA in the low-to-mid six figures, the business sits at the micro end of the leisure spectrum. Its location in Hjørring positions it as a regional player in Denmark’s still-fragmented padel market, which has expanded rapidly since 2018 but remains dominated by single-site or small-chain operators.
Deal Context
The transaction angle is a straightforward strategic bolt-on. Larger Nordic or Baltic leisure platforms seeking Danish exposure could acquire the asset to accelerate padel roll-outs without greenfield build costs. PE interest is secondary; the primary buyers are likely regional sports or hospitality groups already active in Estonia, Latvia, or southern Scandinavia that view padel as an adjacent, high-utilisation product. Founder succession or liquidity needs are plausible given the opaque CVR filings, but the thesis centres on consolidation rather than distress.
Valuation Context
Baltic listed peers trade at 5.0–9.0x EV/EBITDA for profitable operators (Apranga 8.3x, Tallink 7.7x, Tallinna Sadam 9.0x), providing a realistic ceiling. A private Danish micro-asset would warrant a 30–40% discount for scale, illiquidity, and limited disclosure, implying 4–6x EV/EBITDA. On a revenue basis, 0.8–1.2x sales appears achievable if the club demonstrates stable gross-profit conversion above 35%, consistent with regional leisure multiples adjusted for size.
Triage Verdict
GO
- Fit: Micro-scale Danish padel asset in a high-growth niche that aligns with Baltic strategic buyers’ consolidation playbook and offers clear 5–9x exit multiples.
- Red flags: Single-location concentration and CVR gross-profit opacity limit due diligence depth and increase execution risk.
- Next step: Approach the founder via local advisors to gauge openness and request three-year P&L and utilisation data under NDA.
Key Risk
Sustained margin pressure from oversupply of new padel courts in Denmark could compress the EBITDA multiple below the targeted 5x exit floor.
Bottom line: modest bolt-on with clear strategic appeal but requires tighter financial transparency before commitment.
| Company | Ticker | Exchange | Expected | Deal Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SpaceX | SPCX | NASDAQ | 2026-06-12 | — |
| Lycia Therapeutics, Inc. | LYCA | UNKNOWN | TBD | $100.0M |
| DayOne Data Centers Ltd | DODC | UNKNOWN | TBD | $100.0M |
| Pelican Acquisition II Corp | PLCIU | UNKNOWN | TBD | $86.2M |
| GLGHK Ltd | GLG | UNKNOWN | TBD | $40.2M |
| Company | Sector | Valuation |
|---|---|---|
| OpenAI | Artificial Intelligence | $1.2T |
| Anthropic | Artificial Intelligence | $965.0B |
| Databricks | Data and Analytics | $201.6B |
# Company Profiler
You produce a clean company profile from a ticker or a company name.
## Output format
**{Company Name}** ({Ticker}) — one-line sector + HQ.
**Business model:** 1–2 sentences.
**Key financials (LTM):**
**Sector multiples (peer median):** EV/EBITDA, EV/Revenue.
**Recent news / signals:** 3 bullets max.
**M&A angle:** 2 bullets — is this a likely acquirer, target, or neither?
Keep it under 300 words. Be explicit when data is missing.